連續性腎臟替代治療自學手冊介入護理人員學習成效之研究
| 論文名稱(中/英文) | 研究生 | 指導教授 |
| 連續性腎臟替代治療自學手冊介入護理人員學習成效之研究 The effectiveness of self-learning manual on nursing staffs learning continuous renal replacement therapy |
黃意媜 | 許麗齡博士 |
| [ 摘要 ] | ||
| 本研究旨在探討連續性腎臟替代治療(CRRT)自學手冊介入後，護理人員之知識、技能與滿意度之成效探討。研究方法採類實驗不等組前後測設計；研究對象為台北市某醫學中心加護護理人員，共66人；實驗組34人接受兩週的自學手冊介入，對照組32人採傳統教學介入；在自學手冊介入前後，兩組皆接受前後測。以SPSS17.0電腦統計套裝軟體進行資料分析，採用平均值、標準差、百分比、t-test、Paired t-test等方法進行推論性統計分析。研究結果顯示：（一）自學手冊介入後，於CRRT知識得分，實驗組顯著優於對照組。（二）自學手冊介入後，實驗組於CRRT知識後測得分能顯著提升。（三）自學手冊介入後，於CRRT技術自評得分，實驗組顯著優於對照組。（四）自學手冊介入後，實驗組於CRRT技術自評後測得分能顯著提升。（五）自學手冊介入後，實驗組學習滿意度高。本研究結果建議CRRT自學手冊可作為急重症專科CRRT在職教育輔助學習工具，以促進學習成效，進而提升照護品質。此外，建議未來可擴大研究對象，並追蹤病人之預後狀況，以評量連續性腎臟替代治療自學手冊介入其護理品質之成效。 | ||
| [ Abstract ] | ||
| The purpose of this quasi-experimental research was to explore the learning effectiveness of the knowledge, technique and learning satisfaction within nursing staffs after the intervention of continuous renal replacement therapy(CRRT) self-learning manual. Sixty-six nurses were enrolled from intenstive care units of Taipei medical hospital. Thirty-four nurse in the experimental group accepted 2 weeks CRRT self-learning manual. Thirty-two nurses in the control group did not. The cohors in both groups adopted before and after introducing intervention manual. Data was analyzed by SPSS17.0 software package with deductive statistics,frequency distribution, percentage, mean value, standard deviation, t-test and paried t-test. The results showed that experimental group scored significantly better in the test of knowledge, technique and learning statisfaction to CRRT self-learning manual than control group after intervention. In addition, the experimental group had significant differences in the test of knowledge and technique to CRRT self-learning manual compared with pre-intervention. In the future, the strategy of self-learning manual could be applied to continous education for intensive care unit nursing staffs extensively to increase the learning effectiveness as well as to improve the quality of nursing care. Morover, we could also increase the population in study and follow the outcome of patients, evaluation effectiveness of the quality of nursing care. | ||